Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Nov 2015

ENERGY CONSUMPTION, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND EFFECTIVE MEASURES OF GREEN OFFICE BUILDINGS: A LIFE CYCLE APPROACH

,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 161 – 177
DOI: 10.3992/jgb.10.4.161
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

The last few decades have witnessed a rapid development of green buildings in China especially the office sector. The life cycle assessment (LCA) approach has potential to weigh the benefits and costs associated with green building developments. Essentially, the LCA method evaluates the costs and benefits across a building's life cycle with a system approach. In this study, a green office building in Beijing, China, was analyzed by life cycle assessment to quantify its energy use and evaluate the environmental impacts in each life cycle stage. The environmental impacts can be reduced by 7.3%, 1.6% and 0.8% by using 30% gas-fired electricity generation, increasing the summer indoor temperature by 1°C, and switching off office equipment and lighting during lunchtime, respectively. Similarly, by reusing 80% of the selected materials when the building is finally demolished, the three major adverse environmental impacts on human health, ecosystem quality, and resource depletion can be reduced by 11.3% 12.7%, and 7.1% respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that electricity conservation is more effective than materials efficiency in terms of a reduction in environmental impacts. These findings are useful to inform decision makers in different stages of the green building life cycle.

Copyright: © 2015 College Publishing 2015

Contributor Notes

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Center for Energy & Environmental Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

School of Architecture & Built Environment; Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation and Innovation Centre (ECIC), The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia

School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-22-27404446 (H. Du); Fax: +86-22-27404446 (H. Du); E-mail addresses: duhuibin@tju.edu.cn (H. Du)
  • Download PDF